Monday, October 24, 2011

Data at Rest Encryption - Storage Arrays


Three methods:-

  1. Hardware (Back-end) encryption on all types of disks – HDS VSP (and HP P9500) and EMC VMAX can only do this today.

  2. Fabric based data encryption – Brocade Encryption Switch (or DCX encryption blade) with external key management (Thales Key Manager, Tivoli KeyLifecycle Manager, HP Secure Key Manager, RSA) or Cisco MDS 9000 Storage Media Encryption solution.

  3. Self-Encrypted drives (SED) – Encryption in-built drives from Seagate, Hitachi... (IBM DS, NetApp FAS, EMC VNX, HDS AMS, …, SEDs are popular in midrange models)

Interesting to note, Only HDS VSP (and HP P9500) and EMC VMAX can do Encryption on all the supported disk drives in the array (not limited to a drive type or model).

3PAR (P10000), I could not find any public document on Encryption in the array or support for SED drives.

DS8800 red book specifies the drive types supported for encryption and key management and applicable limitations of using encryption on drives.

FAS6200, I could not find any public document on Encryption in the array (ONTAP) or support for SED drives. But I have seen NetApp has claimed/quoted SED drives for FAS6200. Other FAS models support SED, Fair assumption FAS6200 supports SEDs.

Tuesday, July 5, 2011

What is this Chunk of IT?

Interesting talk from IDC - http://bit.ly/orwuXM

Essentially, the IT architecture evolves and transforms. (Problems create solutions, new solution create new problems).

Quick thought on new terminology - Chunk of IT

IT side of a data center consists of Chunk of IT

  1. computing (servers)
  2. connectivity (network)
  3. capacity (storage)

Data Center consumes power & produces business transactions?

Does it consumes Power (kWh) & produces a service (Business transactions / hour)? I hope some vendor will (m)architect such a consumption model or ROI sheet for us :)

Both consumption and outcome of a data center are still subjective and a complex topic.

Customers used to buy servers, storage systems and network equipment. Will they buy chunk of IT instead?

Some options we have today,

  • Oracle Exadata, Exalogic
  • HP Converged Infrastructure
  • EMC and Cisco Vblock / EMC, Cisco VMware - VCE
  • Hitachi Converged Data Center Solutions - UCP
  • IBM CloudBurst
  • DELL vStart
  • Symantec is coming up with chunk of IT for backup space
  • ….

Interesting & new market dynamics, how do we really measure Chunk of IT?

How can customers compare such and make a purchasing decision?

Are we heading for simplification or complication? Perhaps, after the purchasing complication, it is simplification. Perhaps not ! :)

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

“Relationship” “Technicality” “Price” in IT

Pre-sales & technical sales… too sensitive to write about real life experience ?

It was really fun to fight & beat the so-called number one storage player to begin the last quarter. To begin this quarter, it is the first VSP.

Always happy to see deep technical debates.. why ? how ? what ? approach becoming more common.

“Relationship” “Technicality” “Price”, It is worth looking at their % contribution in each sale.

Monday, June 14, 2010

Hitachi Data Systems Geek Day 0.9

http://www.hds.com/go/geekday/index.html

It is all about talking and talking about the greatness of Hitachi storage innovations.

Friday, March 26, 2010

the next Hitachi Data Systems' USP refresh

SearchStorage.com: So what can we expect HDS to focus on with the next big USP refresh?

Yoshida: Well, I'll give you a hint. We've announced ourdynamic provisioning capability. When we implemented dynamic provisioning, we created the concept of a page — you get a pool of RAID groups and divide them up into pages, and do thin provisioning based on the page dynamically because it's all pre-formatted. This page concept is game-changing for us. Now we will manage storage based upon pages rather than volumes and files. That, I think, will be a focus on future products.

http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid5_gci1415232,00.html


Sunday, January 17, 2010

Oracle and Informix I/O profiling - 1

This is an interesting subject in database and storage industry. Today number of I/O auto optimization techniques are evolving such as Oracle ASM at the database front and Dynamic/Thin provisioning at the storage front. Manual I/O designing and optimization for database are already a legacy subject?

Sometimes, we have to cope with the legacy. So I start listing the possible physical storage structure of Oracle and Informix.

Trick is the design of LUN (or volume)? Size, RAID level, Number of spindles … for different I/O profiles of database structures. Theory knowledge on database product and experience may come in handy here.



Saturday, January 9, 2010

List of High-End/Enterprise storage systems

One of my customers asked me a list of enterprise storage systems. Interestingly I could list only five :-) This is the full list.

  • 3PAR InServ T400
  • 3PAR InServ T800
  • EMC Symmetrix DMX-4
  • EMC Symmetrix V-Max
  • HDS USP VM
  • HDS USP V
  • HP StorageWorks XP20000
  • HP StorageWorks XP24000
  • IBM DS8100 Turbo
  • IBM DS8300 Turbo
  • IBM DS8700 Turbo
  • NetApp (FAS Series) FAS6040
  • NetApp (FAS Series) FAS6080
  • Sun StorageTek 9985V
  • Sun StorageTek 9990V


IT Infrastructure Solution Evaluation

Selecting an IT infrastructure solution is always a challenge. I was listing some of the possible criteria to differentiate solutions. I have seen many such solution selections, some of them are decided on personal/organizational relationships, political reasons :-). Whichever the key decision criteria, some technical backing is mandatory. May be this list (I will keep on adding/modifying it) would help someone in some way.

1. System Requirements and Compliance – Answers are binary type – (Yes/No)

Sample criteria:-

  • Need a certified Unix OS?
  • Need to comply with regulations for digital records (Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Securities and Exchange Commission rules 17a-3 and 17a-4 and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA))?
  • Need to comply with "EU Code of Conduct for Data Centers”?
  • Need to comply with "TIA-942 Datacenter Infrastructure Standard”?

2. Solution Architecture Features – Answers are descriptive – (% marks can be given)

Sample criteria:-

  • How far solution logically tired?
  • How far solution physically tired?
  • How far horizontally scalable?
  • How far vertically scalable?
  • How far inter-dependencies between building blocks (servers, VMs, storage arrays/trays ...etc) avoided?
  • How easy to manage the solution?
  • How much control and tracking enabled for the solution?
3. Solution Acceptance (How Well-known, proven)

Sample criteria:-

  • How many professionals/customers approved/implemented?
  • Presence of similar solution implementations?

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Typical model of a Data Center - local mid/enterprise customer

Above diagram is a typical model of a data center - local mid/enterprise customer.

Local SMB customers developing data center for production and DR sites are indecisive with the network design. Once they decide routers, switches and cabling arrangements, it is hard to change the network architecture here and there.

When it comes to a new installation, customer needs to plan the correct place for the new infrastructure in his data center model.

Installation engineer has three repetitive network related questions for any customer.

- What is your Management network IPs for the new servers/storage?

- What is your User Access LAN IPs (hostnames, gateways, network ...etc) ?

- What is your Private Data (inter server/nodes) network IPs (cluster interconnects …etc)?

Essentially, any data center should have above three Ethernet networks with required expandability, isolation and access control (security).

This is one of the simple facts in data center architecting and there are many more such as edge/core design, end of the rack / top of the rack and list goes on.

Saturday, December 19, 2009

I/O data gathering and I/O analysis

I had to do a data gathering for a Storage proposal done by a storage vendor. I was simply doing a passive work instructed by some other party. This makes me thinking how well we can gather I/O data and analyze them. So I start writing down a list of thing which came to my mind. From my old readings, I know I/O analysis and sizing is a tricky subject. There are two contradictory views on the subject as well. Old view is that I/O analysis and sizing is an art, it is interpreted as a mathematical work (not an art) as well.

I have done very few such and most of them are primitive analysis for study purposes, so I really don’t know the subject very well. The lecture notes in http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~pattrsn/252S98/Lec13-queuing.pdf helps us understanding interesting principles of queuing theory in I/O.
So here are some tips to do an I/O data gathering. I am hoping to write about a practical I/O analysis case as well.

At which points can we track the I/O data? -> "Table 1 : Typical I/O Trip"



By which methods can we start gathering I/O data for a proper analysis ? -> "Table 2 : I/O data gathering"

Monday, November 30, 2009

Ideas on IT (Infrastructure) vendor selection / How to select an IT (Infrastructure) vendor


This post is about a business aspect of IT Infrastructure. IT vendor selection process is becoming more and more complicated with technology advances and stiff competition between vendors.
Here is sample process I used to pick and choose an IT infrastructure vendor while I was working for a Telecom client.

Architecture Suitability Criteria
 Architecture of the Main Solution
 Architecture of the Backup Solution
 Architecture of the DR Solution
 End of Life (EOL) and End of Support (EOS) of systems
 Platform and System Familiarity

Vendor Suitability Criteria
 Technical Support
 Human Resource pool (Technical)
 Reference Sites
 Past experience with us

Commercial Evaluation Criteria
 Hardware and Implementation
 Maintenance (5 years NPV)
 Implementation Time
 Support & Maintenance Mechanism
 Support for Version Upgrades and New Modules

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

SAP IT Infrastructure Landscape – Example Design (Cont.)

IT Landscape designing for SAP gains a good experience in IT Infrastructure designing. We can see how some basic designing concepts (like below) behave and work in practice.
  • N (Eg:- 3) tier architecture

  • N (Eg:- 3) systems landscape

  • Application load balancing

  • High Availability

  • Scalability (Horizontal and Vertical)

  • Seamless upgrades and expansions
SAP is a superior ERP product. It has a clear cut guides and best practices in “IT architecture designing, IT architecture sizing”. This is compared to the many other products with no sizing guides, architecture guides.

Nice thing about the SAP’s architecture is that, if you size correctly with future buffers, expanding a SAP IT landscape is seamless. Such an example scenario is given here in this post – “SAP IT Infrastructure Landscape – Example Design”